Flabbergasted Rand Paul Learns Public Employment Decreased Under Obama

abaldwin360:

One of the least appreciated but easily-confirmed facts about the current state of the American economy is that the number of Americans employed by the government has gone down under President Obama. But apparently this is news to one the Republican Party’s most prominent tea party conservatives. During a roundtable discussion on ABC this morning over the size and adequacy of the 2009 stimulus, a flabbergasted Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) asked economist Paul Krugman if he was actually arguing that government employment had gone down under Obama:

PAUL: The thing I don’t understand is that your arguing that the government sector is struggling.Are you arguing that there are fewer government employees under Obama than there were under Bush?

KRUGMAN:Of course. That’s a fact. That’s a tremendous fact.

PAUL: No, the size of growth of government is enormous under president Obama.

KRUGMAN:If government employment had grown as fast under Obama as it did under Bush, we’d have a million and a half more people employed right now — directly.

PAUL: Are there less people employed or more people employed now by government?

As Krugman quickly pointed out on his blog, the answer is “less.” Now, perhaps Sen. Paul was thinking of employment by the federal government alone, which did tick up just slightly: 2.77 million at the end 2008 versus 2.8 million currently. But add in state and local government jobs, and the hard number for government employment dropped by around 600,000 after Bush left office.

read more

224 Notes/ Hide

  1. col-brightside reblogged this from inkteller
  2. inkteller reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  3. peekadora reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  4. bebrilliantgo reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  5. bloodyrainbows reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  6. interestinglyenough reblogged this from abaldwin360
  7. thenocturnalcouchpotato reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  8. hairtrending reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  9. shaktiandawe reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  10. redrookwriting reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias and added:
    Libertarians basically assume that ‘economics’ means they’re always right...their...
  11. thenewcommencement reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  12. mishamansoor reblogged this from truth-has-a-liberal-bias
  13. truth-has-a-liberal-bias reblogged this from abaldwin360
  14. veruca-assault reblogged this from robot-heart-politics
  15. katie-keysburg reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    I don’t think those numbers include people who are otherwise employed...federal money...
  16. actualhomewreckersteverogers reblogged this from 8bitian
  17. nerdlover510 reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  18. thesadgiraffe reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president
  19. vsbrainflow reblogged this from reagan-was-a-horrible-president